Ibrahim
was appointed the paramount ruler of Ebrialand by the then Military
Administrator of Kogi State, Col. Bzigu Afakirya, on June 2, 1997, but a
suit challenging his appointment was instituted before the Kogi State
High Court on March 6, 1998.
Ibrahim
appealed to the Supreme Court after he was ordered to be deposed by the
concurrent judgments of both the Kogi State High Court where the matter
started and subsequently the Jos Division of the Court of Appeal.
But the
Justice Ibrahim Muhammad-led five man panel of the Supreme Court on
Friday struck out the suit on the grounds that the Kogi State High Court
lacked the jurisdiction to entertain the suit because it (the suit) was
caught by “statute of limitation.”
Justice
John Okoro who delivered the lead judgment of the apex court held that
the Kogi State High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit
since the plaintiffs, some of whom are now dead, failed to institute it
within three months of Ibrahim’s appointment.
Justice
Okoro held, “Having appointed the appellant (Ibrahim) on June 2, 1997
and the 1st to 4th respondents becoming aggrieved of the said
appointment, their cause of action arose with effect from June 2, 1997.
“Section
2(a) of the Public Officers Protection Act states that such an action,
prosecution or proceeding ‘shall not lie or be instituted unless it is
commenced within three months after the act, neglect or default
complained of …’
“The
effect of the Public Officers Protection Act like any other statutes of
limitation is to deprive the court of jurisdiction to entertain an
action filed outside the time prescribed in the statute.
“The
first to fourth respondents did not file their suit until March 6, 1998,
clearly about nine months after their cause of action arose.
“That action, in my estimation, ought to have been filed not later than 2nd September, 1997.
“Let me
state again for the umpteenth time that where a law prescribes a period
for instituting an action, proceedings cannot be instituted after that
period.”
The apex
court ruled that the Kogi State High Court, having been robbed of the
jurisdiction to entertain the suit, “in the same vein, the lower court
(Court of Appeal) had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal
arising from a judgment generated from the High Court which had no
jurisdiction to entertain same.”
Justice
Okoro then held, “Accordingly, both the judgment of the High Court of
Kogi State delivered on April 3, 2006 and that of the court below (Court
of Appeal) delivered on January 12, 2009, are hereby set aside.”
Respondents in the appeal are, Alhaji
Maigida Lawal, Alhaji Isa Omolori, Mr. Idris Seriki, Mr. Nwaha Sanni,
Military Administrator of Kogi State and the Attorney-General
Federation.

No comments:
Post a Comment